Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language designs (LLMs), enabled an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with various smaller companies have established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes across a wide variety of industries, consisting of software advancement, healthcare, financing, home entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and product style. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the possible abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using phony news or deepfakes to deceive or control people, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Intellectual residential or commercial property law issues also exist around generative models that are trained on and emulate copyrighted works of art. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, scientists in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of developing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have formerly been explored by myth, fiction and philosophy given that antiquity. [23] The principle of automatic art dates back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where innovators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually developed machines capable of writing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of imaginative automations has flourished throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been utilized to model natural languages given that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and analyzed the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The academic discipline of expert system was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the years since. [31] Expert system research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually used synthetic intelligence to produce creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and showing generative AI works developed by AARON, the computer program Cohen produced to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, specifically computer-aided procedure planning, utilized to generate series of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI approaches such as state space search and restraint complete satisfaction and were a “fairly mature” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to produce crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] process prepare for producing [33] and decision plans such as in model self-governing spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural internet (2014-2019)

Since its inception, the field of device learning used both discriminative designs and generative models, to model and predict information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep knowing drove progress and research study in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this era were normally trained as discriminative designs, due to the problem of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, advancements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks efficient in discovering generative models, instead of discriminative ones, for complicated data such as images. These deep generative designs were the very first to output not just class labels for images but also entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network enabled developments in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] causing the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize not being watched to various jobs as a Foundation model. [40]

The brand-new generative models presented during this duration permitted for big neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision learning or semi-supervised knowing, rather than the supervised knowing common of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning eliminated the requirement for people to manually identify data, enabling bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by a confidential MIT scientist, was a totally free web application that might create persuading character voices using very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to top quality expert system art development from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unmatched capabilities in producing photorealistic images, art work, and develops based upon text descriptions, resulting in prevalent adoption among artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT reinvented the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to participate in natural discussions, produce imaginative material, help with coding, and perform various analytical tasks recorded global attention and sparked widespread conversation about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could fairly be seen as an early (yet still insufficient) version of a synthetic general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who preserved that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘general human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI design combining multiple methods consisting of text, images, video, thermal information, 3D data, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI model available in 4 variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed plans for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 family of large language designs, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models showed considerable improvements in abilities across various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus notably outperforming leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually become a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is additional evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using not being watched artificial intelligence (conjuring up for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device finding out trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend upon the method or type of the information set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For example, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language designs). They can natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as structure models for other tasks. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on programming language text, permitting them to create source code for brand-new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing top quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are frequently used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices using just 15 seconds of training data. [67] The site gained prevalent attention for its capability to generate mentally expressive speech for numerous fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music in addition to text annotations, in order to produce new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a soothing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been generated, like the tune Savages, which used AI to mimic rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists need to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been developed that can be generated using a text phrase, genre alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the motions of a robotic system to produce brand-new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out primary reasoning in reaction to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when offered the timely choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might also be established using connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist simplify workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are used to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been incorporated into a range of existing commercially readily available items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise offered as open-source software application, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with up to a couple of billion parameters can operate on smartphones, embedded devices, and individual computer systems. For example, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with 10s of billions of specifications can work on laptop or desktop. To attain an acceptable speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon products. For instance, the 65 billion specification version of LLaMA can be set up to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI locally include defense of personal privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That online forum is one of just 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has promoted open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language designs with numerous billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, normally operate on datacenter computers equipped with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These huge designs are usually accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to meet the requirements of the sanctions.

There is totally free software application on the marketplace efficient in recognizing text produced by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation methods for identifying generative AI content include digital watermarking, material authentication, details retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have actually often produced false positives, mistakenly implicating students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and regulation

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report details to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI models. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act consists of requirements to divulge copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark generated images or videos, regulations on training information and label quality, constraints on individual information collection, and a standard that generative AI must “adhere to socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is protected under fair use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable use training have actually argued that it is a transformative usage and does not include making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can develop nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs contend with the material they are trained on. [112]

Since 2024, numerous claims related to the use of copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually taken legal action against Stability AI over the use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can certify for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works developed by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, because they lack human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually likewise begun taking public input to figure out if these guidelines require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from federal governments, companies, and individuals, leading to protests, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous governments. In a July 2023 instruction of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has enormous capacity for excellent and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge global advancement” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, however that its destructive usage “could cause horrific levels of death and destruction, widespread injury, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have actually been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computer systems in fact need to be done by them, provided the distinction between computer systems and human beings, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually resulted in 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “synthetic intelligence postures an existential hazard to creative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been viewed as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work issues amongst underrepresented groups globally remains a vital element. While AI assures performance enhancements and skill acquisition, issues about task displacement and biased recruiting processes persist amongst these groups, as laid out in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive actions encompass mitigating biases, promoting transparency, respecting privacy and consent, and accepting varied groups and ethical considerations. Strategies include rerouting policy emphasis on policy, inclusive style, and education’s potential for tailored teaching to optimize advantages while minimizing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI models can show and enhance any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For example, a language model might presume that physicians and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are common in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text “a photo of a CEO” may disproportionately create pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced data set. A variety of approaches for alleviating predisposition have actually been tried, such as altering input prompts [129] and reweighting training data. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness utilizing synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually gathered prevalent attention and issues for their usages in deepfake celebrity pornographic videos, vengeance porn, phony news, hoaxes, health disinformation, monetary scams, and concealed foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited actions from both market and government to identify and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (dispersed ledger innovation) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to generate controversial statements in the vocal style of stars, public authorities, and other famous people have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In reaction, business such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would deal with mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have generated from AI-generated music. The same software application utilized to clone voices has actually been used on well-known musicians’ voices to develop tunes that imitate their voices, getting both tremendous popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar strategies have also been used to produce enhanced quality or full-length variations of tunes that have been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has actually also been utilized to produce new digital artist characters, with some of these getting adequate attention to get record deals at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also producing artists which create unrealistic or unethical interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s capability to create realistic phony material has actually been made use of in numerous kinds of cybercrime, consisting of phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been utilized to create disinformation and scams. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that as soon as deepfake videos become completely realistic, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, potentially resulting in uncritical approval of false info. [159] Additionally, big language designs and other forms of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to produce fake evaluations of e-commerce websites to boost rankings. [160] Cybercriminals have actually produced big language designs concentrated on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, making it possible for aggressors to obtain assist with harmful requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have actually shown that open-source designs can be fine-tuned to eliminate their safety constraints at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models needs a huge quantity of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the funds to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have expressed concerns about the environmental effect that the development and deployment of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater used for information centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical energy usage. [170] [166] [171] There is also concern that these effects might increase as these models are incorporated into commonly utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods include factoring potential ecological costs prior to design development or information collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of data centers to reduce electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more efficient device learning designs, [168] [166] [169] reducing the number of times that models require to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the ecological effect of these models, [168] [167] regulating for transparency of these models, [167] regulating their energy and water usage, [168] motivating scientists to release information on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject matter experts who understand both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times defines slop as analogous to spam: “inferior or undesirable A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have revealed concerns about the scale of low-quality generated content with respect to social media content small amounts, [173] the monetary rewards from social networks companies to spread out such material, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research study paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or wanted content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of websites, were machine equated. Much of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were equated across at least 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had stopped upgrading the data for several reasons: high costs for acquiring data from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other techniques in the natural language processing community, which “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools led to a surge of AI-generated material across several domains. A research study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of recently published computer science papers and 16.9% of peer review text now include content created by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that an average of 34 million images have actually been produced daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is included in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI designs, flaws in the resulting models may occur. [185] Training an AI model solely on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous design’s output, leads to progressive deterioration and eventually results in a “design collapse” after several iterations. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of information gathered from authentic human interactions with systems might end up being significantly important in the presence of LLM-generated content in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is often used as an option to data produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to verify mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence designs while protecting user personal privacy, [188] consisting of for structured information. [189] The method is not restricted to text generation; image generation has been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been utilizing an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a phony AI-generated interview with former racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public looks given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “deceptively real”, and the interview included a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly afterwards amidst the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have released articles whose material and/or byline have been verified or believed to be produced by generative AI models – typically with false material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually utilized generative AI to produce posts for numerous of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had actually produced 10s of thousands of articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, prompting concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually traditionally been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have also been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google supposedly pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce news stories” based on input data provided, such as “information of current occasions”. Some news company executives who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for granted the effort that went into producing precise and artistic newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to compose three posts per day utilizing a beta generative AI design. The program does not require the knowledge or approval of the websites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the released short articles to be labeled as being produced or helped by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually undergone cybersquatting, with short articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed issue that generative AI could have a hazardous influence on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies producing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially more reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to prospective mistakes around the use and misuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about decreasing audience trust, outlets around the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have published guidelines around how they prepare to use and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “mostly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “mainly human with some assistance from AI”. The results of worldwide studies reported that people were more uneasy with news topics consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programming portal

Technology portal

Artificial basic intelligence – Type of AI with comprehensive abilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that imitates discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of big language model
Large language design – Kind of maker knowing design
Music and artificial intelligence – Usage of synthetic intelligence to generate music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically rather than manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of details retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in machine knowing

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, businesses, and federal governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, obtained January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight against AI, human beings win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Brief History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided process preparation: the modern survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI planner based upon the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a conventional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural component clearly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are not being watched multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with not being watched knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type because ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E develops plausible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace people?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that combines 6 types of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-an effective AI model it states can surpass GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI design – and a clever brand-new way to communicate with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4″. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and threats of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its rich psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which consisted of 10,000 “top quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical difficulties that they encountered around the development of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer sparks dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model develop times with new AI-driven part development methodology|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as start-up Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is fundamental. Runway states it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence innovations such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software application … the brand-new A.I. functions, called Copilot, will be available in a few of the business’s most popular organization apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function simply got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to use generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will end up being one of the most crucial features for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated in your area, so you don’t require an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model at home, you will need a computer system build with an effective GPU that can manage the large amount of data and computation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while abiding by stringent U.S. export requirements that limit how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be difficult. That’s a huge issue for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI material for safety, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first guideline on artificial intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators elect tougher AI rules as draft relocations to last stage”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI guidelines to apply just to items for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise welcoming the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market reportedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of innovative tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring an agreement that explicitly requires AI policies to secure writers and the works they produce. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to replace labor-has end up being a crucial sticking point for actors going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more commonly referred to as SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘synthetic intelligence positions an existential hazard to imaginative occupations, and all actors and performers should have agreement language that protects them from having their identity and skill made use of without authorization and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in nations around the world are stressed about AI being a hazard to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are biased. Can reasoning help save them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the challenges of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech might start an international showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. impact campaigns, officials state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the challenges of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at threat from AI-driven disinformation, state professionals”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to take on deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to create star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record deal with AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ forecasts the most significant threat is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being uninteresting”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake evaluations: can we trust what we checked out online as usage of AI takes off?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for environment modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are soaring – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system researcher discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly tries to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The newest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and often identifiable. Large language designs produce text that masquerades as real language with intent behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output emerge everywhere,” she composed. She gives the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dig,” in such a way that individuals do not, which has tossed off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: approximating the occurrence of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Threat to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered mistakes in majority of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was really AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today website. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI short article about ladies’s usage of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, everything – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for traditional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of local news sites is publishing AI-written posts under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter captured using expert system to produce phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated short articles are permeating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will update AI feature after inaccurate news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are shocked to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI might lead to ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s method to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.